Season 2018-19: 25 clubs, a lower salary cap, and an ASW in Tatarstan

KHL Strategy

The Kontinental Hockey League Board of Directors held a meeting today in Moscow, the outcome of which included the approval of the structure for the KHL Championship 2018-19 season, an outline of the draft version of the match schedule for the new season, and the identity of the host cities for the 2019 Week of Hockey Stars.

Chairman of the Board Gennady Timchenko opened the meeting with a minute's silence in memory of the victims of the tragedy in Kemerovo.

The Development Strategy, currently being implemented and timed to run until 2023, received the continued approval of the Board on March 23. The main points of the Strategy had been presented to and approved by the Board back in May of 2017, after which the document was finalized after some fine-tuning to accommodate the views of the League's clubs, the Russian Hockey Federation, and the Ministry of Sport of the Russian Federation.

Photo: 28.03.18. KHL Board of Directors meeting

A hard salary cap with no star exceptions

On behalf of the KHL Board of Directors, a Working Group was created, comprising representatives of 8 of the League's participating clubs alongside members of the Board, and tasked with devising and presenting further proposals designed to bring in a lower salary cap. Based on the report submitted by the Working Group, the KHL Board of Directors decided that the 2020-21 season will see the introduction of a "hard" ceiling for players' salaries, to the amount of 900m rubles and with no exceptions made for "star" players. The decision takes into account the fact that many clubs needed a longer transition period in order to honor the terms and conditions of existing contracts.

This new wage ceiling is to be phased in, with a “soft” salary cap in place for the next two seasons. Under a “soft” cap, clubs may exceed the given limit if they pay a “luxury tax” amounting to 20% of the sum by which the club exceeds the stipulated limit. In the 2018-19 season, the cap will fall to 850m rubles, and for the 2019-20 season it shall be reduced further to 800m rubles, while the “luxury tax” will increase to 30%.

Salary cap: stages of reduction

Season

Salary cap

Season 2018-19

850m rubles «soft»

Season 2019-20

800m rubles «soft» + increase in “luxury tax” to 30% of the sum by which the club exceeds stipulated limit

Season 2020-21

900m rubles «hard» (no “star player” exceptions)

Season 2021-22

900m rubles «hard» (no “star player” exceptions)

When calculating the "hard" ceiling, the Working Group decided to exclude performance-related bonuses, be they individual or team payments, and bonuses for reaching medal places. Nor will the salary cap include wages of players aged 21 or younger.

Dmitry Chernyshenko, KHL President:

- Back in December of last year, on the initiative of one of the clubs, we set up a Committee which included representatives of eight teams. Today, with virtually unanimous support, we adopted a variant in which a hard cap of 900m rubles will be phased in by the 2020-21 season, without any “star player” exceptions. I argued for a scheme with a ceiling of 600m and exemptions for two stars, believing that this would give the clubs more freedom to maneuver, as the most important result we are trying to achieve is the most even distribution of star players among the clubs, and any player who does not perform to a high level of skill would have a salary which corresponds to his level. However, the clubs chose the option we have put before you, and there is sense in resisting. The decision has been made.

Penalties for late payment of hockey players' salaries

In accordance with the rules governing the imposition of penalties on clubs which are more than two months in arrears with the payment of players' salaries, the Board of Directors has fined HC Admiral of Vladivostok for its outstanding debts of December 2017. The fine amounted to 20% of the sum owed by the club to its players.

Dmitry Chernyshenko, KHL President:

- All the clubs have submitted the required financial documentation for next season, as well as their budget details. However, there were 11 clubs which still owed money to their players. The new amendment to the Regulations, according to which penalties are imposed for outstanding debts which remain unpaid for 2 months or longer, has led to a vast improvement in the employer-employee relationship at the clubs. Now we only have one club still in debt to its players, and that club has been fined. All the others have met their obligations in full. I think that this decision was a timely one, and the changes to the Regulations have given a positive result for us.

List of participant clubs in the KHL Championship 2018-19 season

The Strategy stated the need for changes in the composition of the KHL Championship by reducing the number of clubs to 24.

For this purpose, complex analysis has been performed to assess the potential of each participant club in the Championship, This process was introduced for the 2016-17 season, and comprises an assessment according to 8 parameters, ranked by importance, of which the most important are the team's results on the ice.

Parameters for measuring effectiveness of participant clubs 

Parameter

Weight

1

Sporting achievement

30%

2

Players' salaries

20%

3

TV-index

15%

4

Reliance on state funding

10%

5

Arena occupancy rate

10%

6

Late payment of players' salaries

5%

7

Arena capacity

5%

8

Local market potential

5%

Wearing a Hard Salary Cap. On the League’s Long-term Strategy

The current ratings place the following three clubs – Severstal, Lada, and Ugra – outside the top 24. Of these, Severstal's poor rating is mitigated by the impressive progress made by the club over the 2017-18 season. The Cherepovets team finished 8th in the Western Conference standings, thus qualifying for the playoffs for the first time in five seasons; there was an increase in attendances; the club does not rely on state funding; and the club is punctual in payment of players' salaries.

Ugra and Lada, however, performed poorly on the ice, have an over-reliance on state funding (respectively, 82% and 70%), and neither club shows a high demand among the TV audience (occupying, respectively, 27th and 25th place in the rankings). Furthermore, these clubs have a low budget for players' wages, which makes them uncompetitive in the transfer market.

Evaluation of the clubs in the 2017-18 season, as of 28.03.2018Evaluation of the clubs in the 2017-18 season, as of 28.03.2018

Subscribe to our social networks